Current Projects
My dissertation examines HVPT, which exposes learners to diverse speaker pronunciations, enhancing their perception and production of non-native contrasts beyond the instructor's input.
Overview:
Participants: 74 Spanish beginners.
Training: Focused on stop consonants over one semester and 20 sessions.
Results: Significant improvement in perception as training sessions progressed.
VOT Contrast Between English and Spanish
English Voiceless Stops (/p/, /t/, /k/): Longer VOT, up to 59ms.
Spanish Voiceless Stops: Shorter VOT, typically 0-30ms.
Training Results
Before HVPT: Students' VOT averaged 58ms (left image), reflecting English-like aspiration.
After HVPT: VOT decreased to 11ms (right image), showing improved alignment with native Spanish pronunciation.
Takeaway / Practical Applications:
HVPT can be implemented in any language course as a complementary activity to improve production and perception. It only takes 10–15 minutes per session and can be done at home.
My dissertation also analyzes phonetic drift, an area with limited research on how learning a second language influences the phonetics of one's native language.
For more information, feel free to contact me.
In Press Accepted Publications
Andreu Rascón, I., & Casillas, J. V. (2024). Visual Cues in Language Learning: Vowel Perception in L2 Learners. International Journal of Bilingualism. Accepted for publication (under review).
Objective: Explore how English speakers learning Spanish perceive Spanish vowels using both visual and auditory cues.
Methodology
Participants: 169 English-speaking learners from U.S. institutions and Spanish centers.
Proficiency: Assessed with LexTALE.
Stimuli: Bisyllabic non-words presented in four conditions:
Audio-only
Visual-only
Audiovisual
Mismatch (created by maintaing the original visual articulation and selecting audio input from the opposite point of articulation).
Results:
Audio-Only Condition:
Vowel Differentiation Challenges: Lower proficiency students struggled to distinguish vowels with the same place of articulation (e.g., /u/ vs. /o/). Increased proficiency reduced this confusion.
Audiovisual Condition:
Enhanced Vowel Identification: The addition of visual cues improved accuracy.
Visual-Only Condition:
Vowel Confusion Among Similar Pairs: Lower proficiency learners confused visually and articulatorily similar vowels, such as /e/ vs. /i/ and /u/ vs. /o/.
Proficiency-Related Improvements: Higher proficiency students demonstrated greater accuracy in visual vowel identification.
Mismatch Condition (Incongruent Audio-Visual Information):
Auditory Cue Reliance in Lower Proficiency: Less proficient learners predominantly relied on auditory information when audio and visual cues were incongruent.
Visual Cue Prioritization in Higher Proficiency: More proficient students prioritized visual information, suggesting the development of robust visual vowel categories.
Recent Publications
In preparation: